Discrete. Effective. Aggressive.
Trial Attorneys
Free Case Evaluation

Missouri high court to consider statutes of limitations for prosecutors

State and federal protections exist to preserve justice and ensure a fair system for criminal defendants and prosecutors. These protections involve clear, consistent laws that make sure cases run through the system fairly. But a pair of cases before the Supreme Court has cast doubts on the consistency of laws governing Missouri's prosecutors.

Missouri state law allows prosecutors to bring charges for a felony for up to three years after the offense is allegedly committed. The clock is stopped when prosecutors file a criminal complaint or indictment. However, the state's Constitution requires an indictment or information to go ahead with prosecution, which does not include a criminal complaint.

Typically, prosecutors file a complaint first. Then a judge reviews the complaint to decide whether there is probable cause that a crime was committed, after which prosecutors may file an information. An indictment returned by a grand jury can also start a case.

The Missouri Supreme Court is about to hear two cases that involve these conflicting laws and the results could shape criminal justice in the state. In both cases, prosecutors filed a complaint within the necessary three-year window. Greene County judges dismissed the cases, deciding that the law allowing complaints is unconstitutional.

The Missouri Attorney General's office is defending the current statute of limitations. They are arguing that filing a complaint stops the clock on the statute of limitations but does not allow prosecutors to skip the essential step of filing an information or indictment.

But those who oppose the law disagree. ""The constitutional provision prohibits a prosecution absent information or indictment; the statute decrees that a felony prosecution commences with the filing of a complaint. By its terms, the statute contravenes - is contrary to - the Missouri Constitution," said a public defender in one of the cases.

Source: The San Francisco Chronicle, "Mo. high court considers prosecution time limits," Chris Blank, Sep. 29, 2012

To learn more about the rights of those facing drunk driving charges in Missouri, please take a look at our website.

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information

Real Results

Winning Cases They Say Can't Be Won

Travis Noble is a graduate of the National College for DUI Defense at Harvard University, and he lectures at seminars nationwide on DWI/DUI topics. He is the lawyer whom other lawyers consult to defend their DWI clients. Most importantly, he has a track record of successfully defending some of the toughest DWI cases in Missouri and beyond.

Contact Travis Noble | Free Consultations

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information
disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

close

Privacy Policy

Travis L. Noble, Jr.
Rated by Super Lawyers


loading ...

Past results afford no guarantee of future results and every case is different and must be judged on its own merits. The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. This disclosure is required by rule of the Supreme Court of Missouri.

At Travis Noble, P.C. we value your feedback. Click here to write us a review:

Write Us a Review
TN - Travis Noble - Attorneys at Law

8000 Maryland Avenue, Suite 910
St. Louis, MO 63105
St. Louis Law Office Map

Free Consultations
Phone: 314-450-7849
Toll Free: 866-794-0947
Click Here to Pay Your Invoice
Credit Cards Accepted